PORTS Past and Future: The Health Crisis and Starting Anew

When an individual is elected into any office, they are often faced with a number of issues that they must address but had little to no action in creating. This was seen when Senator Voinovich’s was elected Governor of Ohio and had to address the budget crisis, but some problems are not as pertinent or may not appear until later (The Burden of a Budget Deficit). However, the representative is still responsible and must work to find a solution to any and all issues. Senator Voinovich experienced this a number of times in office but one major project that he faced began in 1954, at the beginning of the Cold War, when the Portsmouth Gaseous Diffusion Plant was opened in Piketon, Ohio (Portsmouth Gaseous Diffusion Plant Remarks, 10.30.1999). The plant was created by the United States Atomic Energy Commission to expand the atomic energy program, and was welcomed by Portsmouth locals as a way to develop the local economy (History of the Plant). For years, the plant functioned properly, was passed to private ownership to maintain jobs, and provided stability to the local economy, yet underlying issues would later come to fruition.

In the late 1990s, a series of reports were published by The Columbus Dispatch regarding unusual illnesses in and around the community of Oak Ridge, which was home to a similar plant in Tennessee. The Centers for Disease Control performed a study but found inconclusive results. Soon the issue grew and, in 1999, the Department of Energy “acknowledged that certain workers at DOE sites had been exposed to harmful materials” (Thompson/Voinovich Announce Hearing on Health and Safety Issues, 2000). Senators Fred Thompson from Tennessee and Senator Voinovich held an oversight hearing into the Department of Energy’s health and safety management the following year and discussed the fact that many workers were suffering from Chronic Beryllium Disease (CBD). Senator Voinovich expressed at the hearing:

I believe the brave men and women of Piketon, Oak Ridge and Paducah – as well as all those who have served our nation – deserve to know if the federal government was responsible for causing them illness or harm, and if so, to provide them the care that they need. The time to act is now. (The Department of Energy’s Management of Health and Safety Issues at its Gaseous Diffusion Plant, March 22, 2000)

While the issue had been developing for decades, it was now up to Senator Voinovich to address the harm experienced by many of the workers.

His work began immediately by co-sponsoring the Energy Employees’ Compensation Act in January of 2000 (Beryllium Nuke Workers Press Release, 1.24.2000). Then, in May 2000, Senator Voinovich introduced an expanded version of the original Bill to include all Department of Energy employees, not only those working on DoE facilities. Senate Bill 2519 entitled “Energy Employees Occupational Illness Compensation Act of 2000” ensured civilian employees were entitled to $150,000 in monetary compensation for a number of illnesses relating to nuclear weapon development (Energy Employees Occupational Illness Compensation Act). The Bill was cosponsored by 11 other Senators, both Republicans, and Democrats and was signed into law by President Bill Clinton on December 7, 2000.

While the Bill was a win for all the workers at the plant, a new issue loomed on the horizon. In 1998, Congress had passed legislation that would allow two facilities to be built that would convert depleted uranium hexafluoride into a stable material. One of those facilities was to be placed in the Piketon facility and was to be run by the United States Enrichment Corporation (USEC). However, it was soon clear that facility would not be used as stated as it required a massive restricting to ensure all former materials could be properly disposed of or stored (7.28.04 Portsmouth DUF6 Groundbreaking). The Senator proposed and passed a $279 million bill to fund the clean up the waste and expressed, “Not only is cleanup and transition funding important to the region’s economy, but it also helps address potential hazards to public health and the environment, which is why I’m glad I was able to help secure these funds” (Voinovich DeWine Announce Portsmouth to Receive Federal Funding, 11.19.2003). The cleanup of the massive plant would be a long-term process, but that did not dissuade the Senator as he continued to push forward.


“Public-Public Partnership”: Leadership through Principled Decisions and Relationship Building

“Ideological differences aside, it is necessary for us to have good working relationships if we are going to get anything done for the people who elected us. And I know it is possible from my personal experience.” – Senator George Voinovich, Senate Farewell Speech, December 15, 2010

Senator George Voinovich was able to overcome massive challenges and push for incredible change during his time as a public servant, however, he did not accomplish these achievements on his own. Rather, Senator Voinovich’s focus on partnerships, both private and public, was what made his leadership style so strong. In his new book, Empowering the Public-Private Partnership: The Future of America’s Local Government, Senator Voinovich reiterates how he was able to utilize relationship building to complete initiatives and serve the public in the best way possible. While the book focuses on Public-Private Partnerships, it also discusses “Public-Public Partnerships” and their importance when addressing public needs. Senator Voinovich worked to develop his own relationships with those outside his administration and party, such as George Forbes, the former Democratic president of Cleveland City Council, and Vern Riffe, the former Democratic Speaker of the Ohio House of Representatives. These two partnerships represent his drive to collaborate during his time as Mayor, Governor, and Senator, even when the relationship was strained or difficult to develop.

A prime example of Senator Voinovich’s desire to bring groups together to promote positive change was when he was first elected Mayor of Cleveland in 1980 and the city was on the verge of collapse. At this time, the entirety of Cleveland City Council were democrats and the president of city council was George Forbes, the most powerful democratic president in the city council’s history (Senator Voinovich’s Farewell Speech, 12.15.10). While Forbes originally opposed Senator Voinovich’s run, Senator Voinovich made it a priority to ensure Forbes was involved in the process of addressing Cleveland’s issues: “I immediately communicated to him my belief that the mayor’s office and the city council had a symbiotic relationship and that only by working together could we move the city ahead…The bottom line was that George and I were a team” (Empowering the Public-Private Partnership, 47). They worked together to pass the Cleveland Fair Housing and Police Review Commission, increase diversity in the police and fire departments, and later address racial profiling in the Senate (George Forbes 50th Annual Freedom Fund, 5.20.09; Letter to George Forbes, 3.31.04). By the end of their work together, Cleveland was beginning to turn around as a city and they were fondly referred to as Big George and Little George (Voinovich and Forbes: The Era of Good Feelings, 11.19.12).

This type of relationship building across ideological differences continued when Senator Voinovich was elected Governor in 1991 and began working with the democratic Speaker of the House, Vern Riffe who had been speaker for 22 years (Senator Voinovich’s Farewell Speech, 12.15.10). At this time, Ohio was in the midst of a budget crisis and the only way to appropriately address the issue was through bi-partisan cooperation (The Burden of a Budget Deficit, 6.27.17). While building this relationship was difficult, Senator Voinovich made as many compromises as possible, and the legislature did the same, including major spending cuts and tax increases (Vern Riffe Tribute, 4.4.95). Senator Voinovich and Speaker Riffe would continue to work together on their projects, like addressing the Lucasville Prison riots, and reforming Workers’ Compensation (Vern Riffe Tribute, 4.4.95; State Service for Vern Riffe, 8.4.97). The two built a strong working relationship and while they did not always agree, their drive to help the state of Ohio and their constituents continued to push them to work together.

Senator Voinovich continually reiterated the importance of cooperation and collaboration in order to have successful leadership. While in any office, Senator Voinovich worked to meet his opponents in the middle, to build those working relationships, and ensure that the needs of constituents were put before political fighting. Senator Voinovich’s slogan “Together We Can Do It” was truly his leadership model and he exemplified it throughout his career.

The Burden of a Budget Deficit: The Voinovich Administration and the 1991 Budget Crisis

When Senator George Voinovich took the office as the 65th Governor of Ohio in 1991, the state was facing a biennial budget deficit of about $1.5 billion. While the previous years’ Governor and General Assembly had cut spending and increased revenue to address $270 million of the budget deficit, this problem was not going to be simple to solve. In his Inaugural Address, Senator Voinovich expressed, “It is safe to say that we have never before found ourselves in the midst of a financial crisis of the magnitude we face today” (Inaugural Address, 1991). While the task was daunting, Senator Voinovich and his administration worked across party lines to make hard decisions, including limiting the funding of certain programs and increasing state revenue to address this large deficit.

Since the budget impacts every state agency, local government and individual citizens, many voices would have to be heard in the process and the decisions would be highly contested. One of the primary methods used to edit the budget was utilizing direct contact with public administrators across the administration to request their suggestions and input. The Office of Budget Management provided recommendations to all state departments, agencies, boards and commissions but wanted their input to finalize any decisions made (Memo from Greg Browning to all state organizations – February 5, 1991).

Furthermore, cross-party negotiations and compromises had to be made to address the budget crisis. Following the 1991 election, the Ohio Senate had a Republican Majority while the House of Representatives had a Democratic Majority, which made negotiations more complex as the values of the parties came into conflict. For example, when the budget process began, the Democratic Caucus sent out correspondence to their Senators, describing the issues they had with the budget, which primarily focused on the cutting of budgets for different programs (Correspondence from the Democratic Caucus – March 20, 1991). Additionally, those within the Republican Party sent out alternative recommendations, such as limiting the privatization of the Ohio Turnpike or refinancing the State debt (Correspondence from Senate President Stanley Aronoff to Greg Browning – January 16, 1991). Though this was challenging, former Director of the Ohio Office of Budget and Management, Greg Browning, expressed the importance of working together to complete the project in a recent interview, “This meant that negotiation and compromise were the order of the day. Having a history with both houses and those relationships certainly helped me as a representative of the administration. These relationships matter a great deal in the decisions making process.”

Additionally, a short amount of time was available to make the budgetary decisions, and many compromises were made by all parties. For example, from the beginning, Senator Voinovich had planned to limit any cuts made to primary and secondary education as well as programs that supported children, those with disabilities, and the elderly (Agency by Agency Analysis of the House Budget Bill – May 16, 1991). Furthermore, he agreed to use more money from the Rainy Day Fund as state revenue to alleviate some of the cuts to the budget (Letter from Voinovich to Aronoff and Riffe – July 3, 1991).

The budget reallocations that occurred in 1991 would be the first of many as the administration attempted to control the deficit. Browning expressed, “We ended up with four rounds of budget cuts and a tax increase from January to 1991 to December of 1992.” While these were not easy decisions to make, the administration worked to involve as many people in the decision-making process and make compromises with other organizations to ensure a strong commitment to the public. The end result, while difficult, reiterated to many why Governor Voinovich was elected: he focused on doing more with less. “[George Voinovich] was a great believer in the power of people working together effectively,” said Browning, “He was Genuine George. What you see is what you get. He was a great leader. The kind of guy that people were really happy about.”

Appalachian Regional Commission and Senator Voinovich’s Support: Creating Lasting Partnerships

The Appalachian Regional Commission (ARC) was established by Congress in 1965 to address the economic issues of the Appalachian region (ARC History). It was created because one in three Appalachians lived in poverty before the ARC was created and the region lagged behind the national averages in education and healthcare. Congress established a mandate in the Appalachian Regional Development Act to focus resources on closing the socioeconomic divide between the area and the rest of the nation. Throughout its history, the ARC has worked to develop regional planning, research activities and advocacy, and distribute grants for public-private partnerships to obtain their goals. Their accomplishments included cutting the amount of distressed counties from 223 in 1965 to 77 counties in 2006, dropping Appalachia’s infant mortality rate by two-thirds, and increasing the percentage of Appalachian adults with a high school diploma by more than 70 percent (Hearing before the committee on environment and public works, United States Senate, 2006). The ARC covers all 410 Appalachian counties in the United States, and the partnerships it has been able to develop in Ohio, aided by the Governor’s Office of Appalachia, have been incredibly influential (History of the Governor’s Office of Appalachia)

While Senator Voinovich had been born, raised, and elected in Cleveland, Ohio, he obtained his undergraduate degree at Ohio University in Athens, Ohio. During his time at Ohio University, he would learn more about the Appalachian region and expressed, “My days at Ohio University and my experiences representing the region’s interests as governor and senator have opened my eyes to the unique challenges and assets in Appalachia. I have made a personal commitment to helping this region develop and prosper” (10.5.2005, Appalachian Regional Commission Annual Meeting). To help obtain his goals of development and growth, Senator Voinovich continually advocated for and built a valuable relationship with the Appalachian Regional Commission.

Senator Voinovich quickly recognized the value of the ARC and continually worked to support the organization: “My 2002 ARC reauthorization legislation provided unprecedented funding for a new telecom initiative to help bridge the digital divide and assist businesses and residents in taking advantage of e-commerce opportunities” (10.5.2005, Appalachian Regional Commission Annual Meeting). Following the passage of this Act, Senator Voinovich continued the work by sponsoring the 2003 report “From Vision to Reality…. An Implementation plan for development of the Appalachian Region of Ohio.” The plan worked directly with what was then the Voinovich Center for Leadership and Public Affairs at Ohio University to help encourage entrepreneurship, technological development, and environmental protection.

Following the report, the work of the ARC continued with multiple partnerships with Ohio University and Senator Voinovich. In 2007, ARC and Senator Voinovich hosted the first Energy Summit with multiple Appalachian stakeholders, a summit that continues to take place today (Appalachian Ohio Energy Economic Development Summit, 2007). Furthermore, the Voinovich School of Leadership and Public Affairs has continually worked with different Appalachian communities to promote development across the region. In 2016, Ohio University received a $2 million grant from the ARC’s Partnerships for Opportunities and Workforce and Economic Revitalization program to help develop more than 125 new businesses (OU receives $2 million POWER grant, 8.24.16).

While the Appalachian region has struggled economically, Senator Voinovich continually worked to promote partnerships and innovation in the region. Senator Voinovich was also the primary sponsor during two large reauthorizations of ARC by the federal government, occurring in 2002 and 2008 (Senate Bill 1206 and Senate Bill 496). By supporting the ARC, they were able to work in tandem to support economic development and environmental sustainability through a number of different initiatives. Those initiatives continue today to make steps forward in helping the entirety of Appalachia.

Ohio Family and Children First – The Line in the Sand

“Our aim is to make an unprecedented commitment to one priority that I believe ranks above all others – the health and education of our children… The only way to do it is to pick one generation of children – draw a line in the sand – and say to all: ‘this is where it stops.’ Today, we draw that line” (1991 State of the State Address, Senator Voinovich).

Senator Voinovich made this promise to all of Ohio at his first State of the State address in 1991, and this promise was not one he made lightly. Rather, ensuring that all children were well cared for became one of the largest initiatives throughout his years as Governor. To achieve this goal, Senator Voinovich created the Ohio Family and Children First Council through an executive order in 1992 (Riffe, 1999). By 1994, the initiative became a statewide implementation with the goal of the OFCF Cabinet being, “A partnership of state and local government, communities, and families that enhance the well-being of Ohio’s children and families by building community capacity, strategically coordinating systems and services, and engaging and empowering families.” The multiple partnerships were essential to achieving the goal to life all children and family up, as supporting these individuals does not fall under one sphere.

One of the main actors in working to achieve this goal was Senator Voinovich’s Deputy Chief of Staff, Jacqueline Romer-Sensky. Romer-Sensky was charged to essentially take the challenge Senator Voinovich created and make it real for families all across Ohio; families that deal with incredibly different issues. Romer-Sensky, and the rest of her organizational team and key agency leaders, realized that dynamic and worked to involve a variety of actors: “Trying to lift children up is a multifaceted issue. It is not the domain of any one particular part of government. It’s also beyond government and the only way to tackle some of these really complex issues is to set a table where all of those different components are at the table, including the family’s voice.” To bring in all of these factors effectively, OFCF created councils across Ohio that worked within their specific communities to find out what families need and how to address these issues with the support from the Council at the state level. Together, these groups worked to achieve Senator Voinovich’s motto: “We need to work harder and smarter and do more with less. Together, we can do it.”

Much of this was able to occur because of Senator Voinovich’s passion for supporting children and his recognition that families face different challenges and may need differing types of support. Voinovich was up for the challenge and, as Romer-Sensky expressed about Senator Voinovich, “Ultimately, this is a guy that will do what he thinks is right… This was his passion and he just wanted this to happen. He cared about these kids.” Through the work of the councils, program partners, local groups, and families themselves, OFCF was able to make incredible achievements. The combined effort during the Voinovich Administration resulted reducing infant mortality, increasing the amount of adoptions by 59%, fully funding state Head Start and supporting the growth of publicly funded child care from 18,000 children to 82,000, as well as increased use of Medicaid waivers for home care for medically fragile families and increasing access to Individual Education Plans (JRS_GVV Reflection, 2016; Riffe, 1999). Supporting families and children has continued to be a priority in Ohio even after Senator Voinovich left the governor’s office and is an instrumental part of his legacy.

To learn more about Senator Voinovich’s executive order, click here for the original promotional video about the initiative, created by the Senator’s administration.

Voinovich Supported Martin Luther King Jr.’s Dream of Equality

The renowned civil rights activist, Dr. Martin Luther King Jr., had a central role in the United States’ civil rights movement, and even after his passing in 1968, his legacy has remained impactful to future generations. It fell to his supporters and public servants to carry on his legacy. One such public servant was Senator George Voinovich who played a role in furthering the civil rights movement in Ohio by ensuring that all people were treated equally.

George Voinovich’s support began in 1975 when then Representative Voinovich, voted for the creation of Martin Luther King Jr. Day in Ohio; it became a state holiday more than eight years prior to the federal holiday. Further, in 1981, Mayor Voinovich supported the development of the Annual Commemoration in honor of MLK, an event that is celebrated to this day (MLK Jr. Holiday Commission’s 8th Annual Commemoration, 1.14.1993). Each year, Mayor Voinovich played an active role in ensuring the celebration was a success. Voinovich spoke at the various events regularly to encourage others to heed the call of MLK and his use of civil disobedience, and Voinovich encouraged other cities to celebrate Dr. King’s Holiday while President of the National League of Cities (Commemoration of Dr. MLK Day, 1.18.1986). It was through this work that Senator Voinovich was honored in 1989 with the Distinguished Service Award by the Martin Luther King Jr. Center for Nonviolent Social Change (MLK Jr. Holiday Commission’s 8th Annual Commemoration, 1.14.1993).

Senator Voinovich continually reiterated that while the United States had made major and important changes, the work was never fully complete. He expressed in a speech given at a Cleveland Baptist Church in 1989, “In spite of great progress in certain areas, his work is not done, and if we are honest, it will never be done. There will always be something more we can do” (Community Worship, 1.16.1989). Voinovich continued his work as governor with the 1992 Governor’s Challenge Conference, which focused on being proactive in the civil rights area, equal treatment for all, and addressing the riots that were occurring in other cities at the time. Governor Voinovich addressed the many improvements that had taken place in Ohio, such as the Cleveland Roundtable, race relations training for business leaders, updated police training for community engagement, as well as goals to increase diversity in city departments. Governor Voinovich also created the Ohio Family and Children First initiative to encourage equality at the beginning stages of life and education. His work was substantial enough that Dr. King’s widow, Mrs. Coretta Scott King, attended and spoke to gathered Ohio representatives at this conference to reiterate the goals of MLK and encourage them to follow his legacy (Governor’s Challenge Conference, 6.2.1992).

Senator Voinovich continued the mission of MLK once he was elected to the United States Senate. He presented a bill in 2004 called the Uniting Neighborhoods and Individuals to Eliminate Profiling Act of 2004. He urged his fellow senators and the president to address the issue of racial profiling and bring together communities that had been “torn apart by racial unrest” (Racial Profiling Floor Statement, 2.25.04). While the bill did not pass, Senator Voinovich had made a statement that racial equality was still an important topic all of the United States should address and work towards. Throughout all stages of political life, Senator Voinovich continually supported the work of Martin Luther King Jr. through his own goals and accomplishments in public office, and always encouraged citizens to do the same.

Senator George Voinovich and the Progression of the War in Iraq

By Ellenore Holbrook

Beginning in 2003, the United States became involved in an armed conflict in Iraq as it attempted to remove the government of Saddam Hussein and potential weapons of mass destruction. As a part of the War on Terror following the terrorist attacks on the World Trade Centers on September 11th, more than 1.5 million soldiers were deployed to Iraq to perform combat operations and train Iraqi forces. While the war was initially supported by both houses of Congress, including Former Senator George Voinovich (Statement of Supplemental Spending Request for Iraq and Afghanistan, 2003), the support for the war began to sway in 2004 and 2005 due to multiple issues including the amount of United States military causalities, increasing costs and a failure to find weapons of mass destruction.

The future of the engagement in Iraq changed in June 26, 2007, when Senator Voinovich wrote a letter to former President George W. Bush presenting a plan to begin disengagement from Iraq (Bush Correspondence, The Way Forward in Iraq, 6.26.07). Senator Voinovich, in collaboration with a small group of Senators and Representatives were with the first prominent Republicans to openly address the issues of the Iraq War and look for potential changes in the future. The step in addressing and reevaluating the war was an important move for Senator Voinovich who stated, “Conducting oversight of the government, the administration, and the war is not only our responsibility – it is our duty” (Press Release, Report on Iraq Redeployment Planning).

One of the primary reasons this statement Senator Voinovich made was so integral is because it was one of the first times that such a prominent Republican elected official appeared to be breaking with the administration on Iraq. While Senator Voinovich had avoided supporting another bill in Congress that addressed the war because he believed they could be seen as an attack on President Bush or move to abandon Iraq in general, he knew the Iraq War had to be addressed (Sen. Voinovich Statement on Biden-Hagel Iraq Resolution). Senator Voinovich had a strong history of supporting veterans’ affairs both in the state of Ohio but also at the national level (Dinner with Veterans, 2003), and did not support sending more troops into Iraq (Warner Resolution and the Future of Iraq Speech, 2007). As such, Senator Voinovich worked to find a compromise that would support troops overseas and the veterans who had returned (Iraq Plan Talking Points, 07.24). In his letter and plan to President Bush, Senator Voinovich focused on the cost of the war, the lives lost to military operations, and how continued dangerous environments were limiting potential success of troops in the region (Bush Correspondence, The Way Forward in Iraq, 6.26.07).

Senator Voinovich stressed maintaining stability in the Middle East and stated that a premature withdrawal from the region could destabilize the region and put key allies in jeopardy (Iraq Resolution Speech). Rather, Senator Voinovich’s proposed plan included goals to, “develop a plan for Iraq that can be endorsed by all of Iraq’s neighbors and key international organizations,” while developing a timeline for slow disengagement and, “focusing more energy on refugee assistance, humanitarian aid, and reconstruction aid” (Bush Correspondence, The Way Forward in Iraq, 6.26.07).

Senator Voinovich’s continued dedication to veterans, the safety of the domestic and international spheres, and the ability to work across party lines were evident in his push for change in 2007. While his plan was never made into an official resolution, Senator Voinovich’s stance on the issue was ahead of the curve and put pressure on the Bush Administration and Congress to begin disengagement and a change of force in the region.

The Lucasville Prison Riots: Protecting Lives and Looking Forward

By Ellenore Holbrook

Lucasville began an organized attack on correctional officers as a form of protest against conditions within the facility. Known as the Lucasville Prison Riots, this event took place during then Governor Voinovich’s first term. After the riots ended on April 21, Governor Voinovich worked to address the issues within the Lucasville prison as well as the Ohio Correctional Facilities as a whole. Utilizing the Voinovich Collection, a number of documents tell the story of what happened in April 1993, how Senator Voinovich handled the situation, and the impacts the riots had on policy development in Ohio.

Utilizing a report sent to Governor Voinovich by two staffers in 1999, we can follow the chronology of the Lucasville riot in great detail. The Lucasville Prison Riots began at 3 p.m., when inmates took hold of the L Block within the Lucasville Correctional Facility. By the evening, inmates were holding eight guards hostage and they started negotiations of their 19 demands. The standoff between prisoners and negotiators lasted 11 days, with 10 people killed in the process, both inmates and prison officials.

On April 14, at the request of prison officials, Governor Voinovich ordered 500 National Guardsmen to arrive at Lucasville to help support other police forces in deescalating the situation and providing safety to those nearby. However, the following day the inmates murdered one of the hostage prison guards in order to push for their demands. On April 20, after negotiators and inmates began to consult with one another, the standoff ended and all prisoners and hostages were removed from the L Block.

Voinovich turned his focus to altering and reconstructing the Ohio Correctional System to see why this event had occurred and look to ways of prevention. In his press conference given on April 21, 1993 after the last hostage was released, he announced the creation of the Select Committee on Corrections. This Committee which would evaluate what happened leading up to Lucasville as well as improve the operations statewide. Within the Archives, multiple memos, discussions, and findings from this first plan discuss its goals and outcomes in detail. The goal was to encourage community corrections for non-violent offenders so prison space could be utilized for criminals that must be removed from society.

While the entire final report from the Committee on Corrections can be found on the digital archives, the main findings included a need for change within the prison system and offered recommendations in the areas of prison crowding, diversion programs, substance abuse, mentally ill inmates, and prison security. Governor Voinovich added to this through his own personal notes on the physical document by requesting special reports regarding substance abuse, mentally ill inmates, as well as addressing the issue of racism in the prison system.

Throughout the Lucasville prison riots, Governor Voinovich worked at monitoring the events as they occurred and supporting the experts handling the event. After, Governor Voinovich focused on continuing to develop the Ohio Corrections Facilities to prevent an event like the riots from happening again, while improving the system as a whole. More information about this event, and its impact on future decisions the governor made can be found in the collection.

Exploring Voinovich’s Impact: The Voinovich Collections

By Ellenore Holbrook

Former Senator George V. Voinovich served as a public servant of Ohio for more than 45 years and was elected to more offices than any other person in Ohio’s history. Throughout his career, he was elected to the Ohio House of Representatives, served as the Lieutenant Governor of Ohio, as Mayor of Cleveland, Governor of Ohio, and finally US Senator. His life and work in government, his meetings, memos, decisions, policies, communications and more have all been saved, organized and archived.

The Voinovich Collections are archives comprised of the Mayoral Collection, the Gubernatorial Collection, the Senatorial Collection, and the Campaign Collection. The best way to begin learning about the archives and all it has to offer is through the online portal, which can be found at www.voinovichcollections.library.ohio.edu. While the online tool is not all encompassing of what the archives have to offer, it provides a helpful search feature as well as digital renderings of some of the documents located in the physical collection.

The goal of the archives and the website is to help disseminate the collected materials and the knowledge that can be gathered through them. Senator Voinovich impacted millions of people during his service, and with the preservation and use of the archives, his impact can continue to live on.